The Student Activities Board, the Undergraduate Student Government agency responsible for bringing big acts like Aziz Ansari, Bruno Mars and Christian Finnegan to campus last year, received an additional $264,887 over last year’s initial budget despite drastically overspending their 2010-2011 budget, in violation of USG’s own bylaws.
The recent increase will bring SAB’s budget to a record $534,887.26, tripling the size the agency was just two years ago. SAB now accounts for almost a fifth of the entire USG budget.
USG Treasurer Thomas Kirnbauer said that the change in SAB’s budget was a strictly a policy decision. “They did a really good job last year at reaching a large number of students and they deserve it,” said Kirnbauer of the increase. “We’re going to have a Fall event,” he said, similar to the end-of-year concert that SAB holds every spring.
But while SAB may have been successful in appealing to students, they struggled to control their spending. A pattern of fiscal irresponsibility has emerged, and evidence and anecdotes of excesses and financial mismanagement are plentiful.
In March, SAB spent $10,000 to bring the Upright Citizens Brigade, a popular improv troupe based in New York City, to campus for the second time that year. But days before the event was scheduled, SAB pulled the plug on the performance, fearing that too few students would show up. The troupe still made the trip to Stony Brook, and collected their check sitting in the USG office.
Food is also a popular expenditure for SAB. Providing snacks for guests is common practice, but walking into USG’s offices in late June you would have still found yourself surrounded by gallons of soda and boxes of unopened snacks purchased and never used.
T-shirts that were purchased and never distributed sat in the USG office for months until the last week of the semester, when Kirnbauer and other USG officials unloaded dozens of them to students waiting in line for the Bruno Mars concert.
But it was the end-of-the-year concert itself featuring Bruno Mars and Janelle Monáe that caused most of the problems. It cost $140,000 to book the act, but there were several other costly expenses that SAB did not adequately account for, or ultimately even have the budget for.
SAB began pushing checks through the USG accounting office, circumnavigating around the built-in checks meant to catch reckless spending by USG clubs and agencies.
“They didn’t go through the proper channels,” said Kirnbauer, noting that expenditures would normally have to be approved by the USG Senate.
“It was obviously breaking the rules,” said Kirnbauer, who described the actions as “not illegal, but highly frowned upon.”
Whether there is a single person or entity that broke the rules is unclear, but several layers of protection against overspending were ignored along the way. The planning committee itself, headed by then SAB Director Moiz Khan, knew their costs would come in over budget and failed to obtain—or even seek—USG senate approval for additional funds. The USG accounting office, responsible for ensuring clubs and agencies do not spend more than they have in their budgets, did not catch SAB’s spending until it was too late. And USG itself allowed SAB to bypass normal protocol of obtaining funds.
SUNY policy states that each student government must develop procedures to regulate spending. The policy reads: “The internal control guidelines will provide the fiscal agent with operational and fiscal procedures that must be observed by the student government.”
And according to Stony Brook University’s USG financial bylaws, vouchers requesting access to funds must be submitted five to seven days in advance and should be rejected by the accountant if there are insufficient funds in the club’s budget.
That was the case by mid May, according to USG’s accounting office.
Barbara Leigh-Manuell, who works in the office, described SAB as “well over budget” in a conversation on June 27. And according to Kirnbauer, invoices from the Bruno Mars concert are still coming in as of this week.
On June 28, more than a month after the concert and with SAB already in the red, Gina Windisch, another accountant in the office, received three more invoices, one for $2,500, related to the concert.
Kirnbauer denied Think Magazine access to SAB’s precise budget on Wednesday, saying that he wanted to release one final budget report once an exact figure was available, in approximately two to four weeks.
That’s around the same time Stony Brook University will begin their annual auditing process and take a close look at how rampant overspending was allowed to happen unchecked.
Vice President of Student Affairs Dr. Peter Baigent is the final word on USG’s budget. He must approve the USG budget before it is enacted. Baigent rarely if ever interferes with the specific budgetary decisions made by USG, but in March he spoke with USG officials, warning them that more controls needed to be put on SAB’s funding. Last year was the first time SAB’s budget was distributed as a lump sum and not a line-item budget, which granted them more flexibility to book larger events that are often only on the market for a few days.
The new policy is also part of what contributed to the lack of oversight of SAB’s spending. Single items no longer needed approval, as is the case with most USG clubs.
Baigent said that he would point auditors in the direction of SAB when they begin their annual check in mid to late July. Based on what he’s seen so far though, these actions may have been against the rules, but not against the law.
“The bylaws are in place to assure all students an equal ability to access the Student Fee money,” he said, pointing out that illegal activities would lie more along the lines of theft than mismanagement.
But despite mounting evidence of SAB’s inability to manage money and the lack of any effective oversight, USG has placed its faith – along with well over half a million dollars – with the organization.
“We have a checklist of what we need for these events now,” said new USG President Mark Maloof, who does not anticipate this happening again in the future. He also indicated that greater attention would be placed on SAB in the coming year, and that he would be much stricter with them.
Meanwhile, clubs, which have already seen drastic reductions in their 2011-2012 budgets, may also pay a price for SAB’s budget overruns.
The USG budget is designed to handle large events that come in over budget, but at the cost of the next year’s budget. During a process called Fall Revisions, unspent money from the previous year is allocated to clubs and organizations that request additional funding. The less money that’s left over at the end of the previous year, the less money clubs are able to earn back in the revisions process.
USG Treasurer Tom Kirnbauer has estimated that number to be in the six figures, but with SAB invoices expected to continue to arrive until August, the budget for Fall Revisions is steadily becoming smaller.
It’s also possible that even SAB will request fall revisions. Last semester, former USG Treasurer Moiz Khan requested an initial budget of $700,000 for SAB, according to Kirnbauer.
But in a year in which clubs were cut by about $175,000, Maloof said he, along with Kirnbauer, plans to “distribute a percentage of the rollover [budget] amongst the clubs that experienced budget cuts,” not to clubs who saw increases.
SAB’s increase of $264,887.26 from last year’s initial budget is made up of money from several other agencies and club budgets. Money cut from contract services like NYPIRG and Child Care Services, along with $80,000 that was included in last year’s budget to renovate the commuter lounge in the Student Activities Center, also went towards SAB’s 2011-2012 budget.
Trevor Christian
Latest posts by Trevor Christian (see all)
- Say it Ain’t Snowe - March 6, 2012
- Chernow Promoted - March 6, 2012
- A Liberal Helping of Comedy - March 6, 2012





FISCAL MISMANAGEMENT deserves a raise.
“They did a really good job last year at reaching a large number of students and they deserve it,” said Kirnbauer of the increase.
That large number of students INCLUDED Graduate Students who DON”T pay the same student activity fee and who contributed NOTHING to the events that were put on by USG.
USG’s funds have been referred to as the “public purse” and USG is being used as the ATM for campus entertainment and it now appears for renovations (along with $80,000 that was included in last year’s budget to renovate the commuter lounge in the Student Activities Center.) In the future maybe USG should ask the Graduate Student Organization to contribute to campus events and renovations. There should have been two fees for SB students and the Graduate Students should have been charged more for admission.
A “student” seat taken by someone who doesn’t pay the undergraduate student activity fee is one less seat for someone who does.
Even if everyone had paid the public price of $25.00 for the Bruno Mars and Janelle Monáe concert, SAB would not have covered even half of its expenses.
SAB gave away the store in 2010-2011. If they had covered their expenses and planned better and been fiscally responsible, there would not be a need for a budget in excess of a half a million dollars.
Let’s not forget who was pushing for the increase in the student activity fee in the Fall of 2010, who knew how to manupilate, and who could circumvent ALLOCATE and who was the USG Treasurer from December 2009-May 2010, that would be the same person who was the Director of a “FISCALLY MISMANAGED” SAB, Moiz Khan.
Let’s also not forget that the USG Treasurer Thomas Kirnbauer, ran with the same party, “Student Polity,” as Moiz Khan, when Moiz made his failed attempt to be this years USG President. Would Thomas Kirnbauer have been so lenient had it been anyone else, other than Moiz?
Where were the advisors? What about internal controls and all those checks and balances USG had been working on over the years? Someone is ignoring policies while someone else is looking the other way, when they did it.
Moral of the story- Don’t let a History major who wanted to repeat history by naming his party “Polity” handle any of USG’s finances. He should also be made to step down from his newly appointed position as the USG Chief Justice. He has done enough damage while beefing up his resume and it is time for him to be held accountable.
What’s old is new again, and when SAB revived the old Stony Brook Concerts Logo, they should have looked to see what students were being charged for admission back then.
An example of student prices in 1984:
Zebra- Student Tickets were $10.00 & $8.00
Frank Zappa- Student Tickets were $10.00 & $8.00
Santana- Student Tickets were $13.00 & $11.00
“Reaching a large number of students”- Charging students $5.00, which is less than what a pack of cigarettes cost today, explains the sucess of attendance and fiscal mismanagement.
Let us also remember that Moiz Khan was on the USG Senate in the Fall of 2009 and he also sat in periodically as a Proxy during the 2010-2011 Senate meetings. “The Three Musketeers,” Moiz Khan (SAB Director), Michael Spinelli (USG Senator) and David Mazza (USG VP of Communications), where all in attendance at the SAB meetings, they knew exactly how to go about getting additional funding. They chose NOT to follow policies and procedures and they will still be involved in USG in 2011-2012 as APPOINTED members of the USG Judiciary. We can thank Mathew Graham (USG President 2010-2011) for that!
Those who violate the USG By-Laws should be banded from any positions within USG!
Do we really want these three making judgment calls on others, when they can’t follow the rules themselves?
BTW- even Campus Recreation who receives funding from USG has enough sense to discount ticket sales to undergraduate students who pay the activity fee and are currently enrolled in classes. Campus Recreation charges MORE for Graduate students, faculty and University staff who provide NO financial support for their programs. This is how it should be!
Campus Recreation Summer Schedule:
Summer Kayak Trip June 10th & 15th
Cost: $25.00 for (grad/faculty/staff) each trip includes kayak rental and lunch
Undergraduate students registered for summer classes are FREE. Open only to students/ faculty/staff of the University
Trip to Six Flags June 30th
Cost: $10 for Undergrad students
$25 for Grad students and Faculty/Staff
This trip is $10.00 for SBU undergraduate students who are registered for summer class payable at the time of registration (includes ticket and bus transportation). Tickets are available for graduate students/faculty/staff. Cost is $25.00 payable at the time of registration (includes ticket and bus transportation).
Summer Paddleboard Trip- July 8th
Cost: $15.00 Undergraduate Students
$30.00 for (grad/faculty/staff)
Registration fee is $15.00 for undergraduate students (registered for summer classes) and $30.00 for graduate students, faculty/staff.
http://studentaffairs.stonybrook.edu/rec/
Campus Recreation’s budget from USG for the Summer 2011 is $28,000.00.
If you do not pay the USG student activity fee, you are not entitled to the same discounted “student” prices for USG events, as someone who does pay the fee. USG needs to take a lesson from Campus Recreation!
From the Office of Student Activities: Student Club/Organization Manual 2010-2011
CHAPTER 6: FUNDING
All Undergraduate students at Stony Brook University pay a student activities fee each semester which funds all the USG funded clubs and organizations. Graduate Students pay a Graduate Student Activity fee which funds Graduate Clubs/Organizations on campus.
USG Line – An undergraduate group is eligible to propose a budget to the USG if they are recognized by the Office of Student Activities and the membership is not exclusive.
GSO – This option is available to all Graduate student clubs and organizations that are
recognized by the Office of Student Activities.
Dues – These are fees collected by clubs and organizations for league fees, national recognition, registrations… You can visit SAC 200 for more details on this account process.
Any undergraduate clubs and organizations that are seeking or are funded by the USG line visit: http://sbusg.org/laws/constitution-and-by-laws/
Any graduate clubs and organizations that are seeking or are funded by GSO visit: www.sbgso.org
CHAPTER 3: ON CAMPUS EVENTS
Step Three: Meet with Program Advisor
The budget of USG is inherently a policy document. It is what the current administration believes be to be the best estimations for the next years budget. What you may call “fiscal mismanagement” others can see as the proof of the need for more funds in the SAB budget.
Good thing Christopher Hitchens didn’t show up, or SAB would have really been over budget by even more, like $18,500 more.
Those “OTHERS” (Current Administration) are wearing rose colored glasses and so long as it isn’t their money being spent, they don’t care!
The accountability falls on the shoulders of those involved in SAB who circumventing the EVENT planning budget process and who failed to follow policy and procedure.
If USG continues to give away the store, it is “fiscal mismanagement” and Moiz I’m sure you would be more than willing to give USG your credit card to do as they feel fit with it, wouldn’t you? But what damage could they do if you only have a $500 credit limit?
FALSE STATEMENT:
“The USG budget is designed to handle large events that come in over budget, but at the cost of the next year’s budget.”
TRUE STATEMENT:
All clubs & organizations including SAB are to spend within their budgets.
SUNY Policy:The student government and the fiscal agent shall be responsible for assuring that the budgetary amounts are not over encumbered or over expended.
http://www.suny.edu/sunypp/documents.cfm?doc_id=525
We are still waiting for Kirnbauer to release the final budget report on SAB once an exact figure is available, in approximately two to four weeks. The clock is ticking. What damage has SAB done?
Pingback: Missing the Point | Moiz Khan Malik
Approval between Campus and Promoter
The Administrative Director of USG or Assistant Director and the Promoter of the event must agree adequate funding is available to cover the event expenses. They will review budget and timeline items. The approval must take place prior to contract signing, and at least 6 weeks prior to event. Pending the funding source, if organization is USG funded then it would need to go through the USG Administrative Director. If organization is not funded then they must see their Program Advisor for an initial meeting to go over the funding source for the event.
http://studentaffairs.stonybrook.edu/forpolicies/policies/event.shtml
‘MUST AGREE THAT ADEQUATE FUNDING IS AVAILABLE TO COVER THE EVENT EXPENSES”
Here is the “LACK OF ANY EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT”-The Administrative Director of USG or Assistant Director and the Promoter of the event must agree adequate funding is available to cover the event expenses.
So not only was SAB “Fiscally irresponsible” but there was failure on the part of the Administrative Director, Eunice Ro, to make sure that SAB was not “fiscally mismanaging” their budget.
To Quote Moiz:
“What you may call “fiscal mismanagement” others can see as the proof of the need for more funds in the SAB budget.”
Take it from where it comes, he is just another one of those USG Eboard members, with his head up his ass!
USG Budget Workshop Information Packet (2010-2011)
Note from USG Treasurer (Dec 2009 to May 2010) Moiz Khan:
When I took office this past December, one thing was extremely clear, the USG Voucher Process was incredibly inefficient. In the month of January, I worked alongside CEAS Senator Alexander Dimitriyadi and the USG Assistant Treasurer Ken Colton to create a system that would streamline the USG voucher process and ultimately make the process more transparent. With ALLOCATE, we have accomplished that and much more.
ALLOCATE allows clubs to create vouchers associated with events as well as non-event vouchers and track their progress. The system will improve communication as ALLOCATE alerts club leaders by email if their voucher is being held. ALLOCATE will also allow USG to reduce its environmental impact as it requires less paper and will eventually aid USG into transitioning to a paperless work environment.
—————————————————————————————-
ALLOCATE must have failed to detect that SAB was being fiscally irresponsible. ALLOCATE has NOT made USG more transparent. HAD all expenses been booked through ALLOCATE and approved by the Administrative Director then SAB should not have been in the RED. If ALLOCATE was used properly and expenses exceeded SAB’s funds then SAB should have been alerted that they had insufficient funds to cover the event expenses.
Somebody “streamlined” the event expenses and this made ALLOCATE “incredibly inefficient.” Somebody “circumnavigated around the built -in checks meant to catch reckless spending by USG clubs and agencies.”
One guess who that somebody was, obviously it was somebody who should have known better!